Tennessee Veteran 2026 Annual In-Person Board Meeting Minutes Report
Held Aug 18, 2025 @12pm at VFW Post 1291, Nashville, TN
Overview: This meeting of the Tennessee Veterans (TNVET) executive board and member organizations focused on the 2026 legislative agenda, specifically addressing property tax reimbursements, a proposed veterans’ lottery, and the potential support for medical cannabis. The group emphasized the need for a stronger grassroots movement to overcome legislative stagnation and “political extortion” regarding veteran benefits.
The meeting began approximately at noon with comments and actions by TNVET Chairman Joe Leurs.
Roll Call
The following TNVET organizations were represented at the annual meeting:
AMVET, DAV, FVC, MCL, MOAA, VFW, VSO, VVA, WVA
Not represented: AFA, Buffalo Soldiers
Treasurer Report
A very basic report on the treasury account was presented by Bill Summers, as the TNVET Treasurer was unable to attend, but has provided a full detail written report for distribution with these minutes. Organizations were alerted the treasurer would be contacting them for updated membership counts for TNVET dues purposes.
Legislative Discussions, Priorities & Strategy Recap of 2026/27
Property Tax Reimbursement
TNVET is fighting to eliminate a regulatory “fine print” concerning “market value” calculations that reduces the $175,000 property tax reimbursement for 100% P&T disabled veterans. TNVET is seeking a new House sponsor for the property tax bill following Representative Crawford’s primary loss. TNVET thanks him for these past 3-years of effort to get the changes made. We have potential contacts with another interested legislative sponsor.
The Issue: The state currently applies a market value adjustment that decreases the actual reimbursement as property values rise. In Montgomery County (as an example), some veterans had seen their reimbursement drop over 60% over a 4-5 year period due to the state using market value increase to reduce the amount of reimbursement. Tennessee is the only state that does this.
Fiscal Impact: Making these veterans reimbursements “whole” would cost the state approximately $6 million more to fund.
Strategy: TNVET will continue to push for a clean $175,000 reimbursement without market value offsets.
Questions submitted to TNVET on the issue. 1) Can we propose a reimbursement on lesser VA disability ratings? Answer: We could, but the amounts of funding needed to cover the increased number of eligible vets would be substantial and any legislation that drives up costs is sidelined and buried, when and where possible by legislators. In addition, what would the cutoff VA disability percentage be and the rationale for that level? Plus, any expansion of disability eligible would still suffer the issue of market value adjustment, which TNVET is working to eliminate. There are 25 states that cover 100% of the property taxes for 100% P&T disabled vets, There are a handful of states that provide some financial reimbursements for lesser VA disability ratings. 2) Can property tax reassessments be frozen for vets? Answer: It would take a change to current state law to do this and very unlike to get far. As with the property tax reimbursements there are other groups…disabled, seniors, and the poor that are involved and affected. Legislators will want to include them or ask why should vets get it all (yes we have heard those very words in legislative committees) and that drives up the cost. This would result in large tax collection reductions/shortfalls in counties/cities with high veteran populations such as Clarksville, Memphis, etc. As with the current property tax reimbursements, the state financial replaces the money so the county does not lose revenue. You can bet the counties/cities would expect the state to make them financial whole, if such a law was being considered. If the state would not, the counties/cities won’t support it. This would result in millions of additional state dollars needed. The state was already pleading poverty in the last legislative session…even though they just recorded a $1.2 billion revenue surplus. 3) Can a bill be proposed to not kick vets out of their home due to nonpayment of property taxes? Answer: The same issues/answer listed in Question 2 are in play here too.
Veterans Lottery Resolution
A proposed constitutional change to create a separate veterans’ lottery (similar to Texas) to fund veteran services and housing.
Timeline: As a constitutional amendment, it requires two legislative sessions to pass before going to a public ballot, likely in 2030.
Opposition: Anticipated pushback from the education lottery lobby. The board clarified that the education lottery funds scholarships and higher/additional education opportunities, not local school boards, and a veterans’ lottery would not impact that school system revenue stream.
Questions submitted to TNVET on the issue. 1) Could this be delayed to concentrate on the property Tax reimbursement? Answer: The consensus is no for several reasons. First, it takes two different state legislative sessions (a session is two years long) to vote and approve the measure to get a constitutional change on the ballot and election/vote is done in the year of a governor election. If we are unsuccessful this coming year, we still have another year in the session to work the bill. Any delay could push the constitutional vote back to 2034. Second, we have legislative sponsors that are willing to sponsor the bill. Third, the legislative Veteran Caucus is supportive of the effort in the last session. 2) Could legislators fight this if it takes money from school boards? Answer: This was addressed in the “Opposition” section above. We know from past legislative battles that legislators do not always know how programs are funded or the rules involved with that funding. This may be the case on this question as the Education Lottery is NOT a source of funding for local school systems. The state, county/city, federal money/grants are the sources of funding for schools.
Medical Cannabis Support
The board voted unanimously to support medical cannabis legislation, if a legislator takes the lead.
Rationale: With the federal government moving toward Schedule III classification and 41 other states having working and regulated medical cannabis programs, the board views this as a necessary medical tool for veterans with PTSD, TBI, and chronic pain.
Constraint: TNVET will not initiate the bill but will formally sign on as supporters to provide political cover for sponsoring legislators.
Questions submitted to TNVET on the issue. 1) Could we delay until the federal government decriminalizes it? Answer: 1) reference “Rationale” above. Secondly, the DOJ has stated that states with federally approved and working/regulated programs can now be in the medical cannabis business. Otherwise. the current 9 states that do not have approved/operational programs (in the southeast that is only Tennessee and North Carolina) are subject to all federal laws and punishments on cannabis. The few Tennessee state laws on medical cannabis usage/dosage/transport actually violate federal law. In the past, legislators were unable to answer the question that if federal laws didn’t support cannabis of any kind, why do we have state laws that violate federal? 2) Should we wait until VA has done its assessment of medical cannabis? Answer: As of May 15, 2026, an amendment to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), allows healthcare providers to recommend medical cannabis to eligible veterans in states where it is legal. The VA is working to issue specific guidelines and protocols for implementation. However, that means nothing in Tennessee, until the state approves a medical cannabis program.
Organizational Advocacy & Outreach
The board identified a critical failure in communicating with “grassroots” members of our member organizations. While TNVET represents nearly 50,000 veterans through its member organizations, legislative alerts often fail to reach many individual members. This is resulting in low engagement of veterans to legislators on important issues. Only hundreds of individual veteran communications/emails/calls/letters on legislation are reaching legislators when thousands should be. The lack of massive direct communication engagement weakens the veteran message and hinders legislative interest to resolve issues.
Solutions: “Grassroots Engagement Strategy”
Step One – More Organizational Communication Involvement Is Required
Each veteran organization needs to do more internal tracking on the flow of communications they forward on TNVET information. TNVET information/action updates are sent to the listed organization points-of-contact. We know that the info, in most cases that we can track, gets sent/forwarded to the next level which are usually divisions, chapters, posts, detachments, etc. After that the info stream/distribution appears to dry up all too often and not be sent to the grassroot member. It’s those grassroot members that contact TNVET complaining not receiving information. They may see it on our Facebook page, from other veteran organizations they are in or through the grapevine from friends.
Step Two – Identify Communication Gap…veterans not a member within a TNVET veteran organization or nonaffiliated veterans….those not in any veteran related organization
TNVET is aware of a lack of “traditional” engagement from younger veterans in post military organizations. While TNVET operates a Facebook page it seems a bigger social media strategy is required to help get information out and increase the nonaffiliated veterans interest and impact on legislation that directly affects many of them……but they are unaware of it. Too many think the federal government is the source of all veteran benefits when it is not. We have this same issue with many legislators thinking the federal government takes care of all veteran needs.
Step Three – Develop Broader Social Media Strategy
The strategy will look at direct outreach via digital expansion. Focus on Instagram, Snapchat, and gaming forums where younger veterans congregate. TNVET Chairman Joe Leurs has assigned this project to himself with assistance from DAV rep Joy Leapheart. The plan will be submitted to the TNVET Board within 45-days for action/review.
Potential Legislation Issue and Operational Updates
BNA Airport Parking: The board is investigating the elimination of free parking for disabled veterans at BNA. While the airport cited FAA regulations, research into other airports (Jacksonville, San Antonio) suggests this is a local business decision.
VSO Funding & Standards: Discussion regarding the CBSO Act and state-level surveys of County Veteran Service Officers (VSOs). There is concern about the state attempting to standardize or control VSOs who are currently funded by counties. Alex Jones (VSO) and Tim Woody (TNVET/AMVETs/VSO) will work/monitor this issue.
Website Transition: The TNVET website was being migrated to a standalone host (Host Papa) but has encounter unexpected issues. We are currently offline at the submission of these minutes. VVA has been hosting the TNVET website (which we are very thankful for) and may still be. The problems with Host Papa and are being worked. TNVET thanks VVA for their efforts and support these past years.
Veterans Day on the Hill: Planning continues for early 2027. It will happen the last week of January 2027 or first week of February. However, in the past, Wednesday of those weeks has been the targeted day. We may need to flexibility of going to a Tuesday or Thursday as scheduling is always a problem when a newly elected session of the legislature meets.
Economic Impact of Tennessee Veterans – Did You Know?
The board highlighted these figures to leverage support from the Governor’s office:
Total Economic Impact: $32 Billion.
Federal Dollars to TN: $7.16 Billion annually.
Veteran-Owned Businesses: ~18,000.
TN National Ranking: 14th in veteran population, but 39th in veteran benefits.